Synthesis (show how to prepare X from Y..)

Alkenes can be prepared from a combination of ylide and aldehyde or ketone. This is the Wittig reaction.

One carbon on the alkene comes from the carbon bonded to the PPh₃ on the ylide, and the other carbon comes from the carbonyl.

There are usually two different ways to make an alkene via the Wittig reaction. So is one way better than the other?

Yes. Ylides come from the S_N2 reaction of PPh₃ with an alkyl halide. Because it's an S_N2 reaction, you want to use the least substituted alkyl halide! (1º is better than 2º). So of the two reactions below that would result in the desired alkene, the top method is better because it involves the less bulky alkyl halide.

This principle also holds true for the Williamson ether synthesis (problem 703). Less substituted alkyl halides are better for S_N2 reactions.

Epoxides can open up in two different ways.

To add a nucleophile to the less substituted side of an epoxide, use basic conditions. This is done in #2 below.

To add a nucleophile to the more substituted side of an epoxide, use acidic conditions. This is done is #1 below.

Why do the conditions matter? Epoxides have two electrophilic carbons. Normally nucleophiles will preferentially attack the less substituted carbon, as they do in S_N2 reactions. Recall that S_N2 reactions usually happen with strong nucleophiles- that is, negative charges (basic conditions).

When an epoxide reacts under acidic conditions, the transition state has carbocation character, and so it's sort of like an S_N1 reaction. That is, instead of less substituted carbons being favored due to less steric bulk, more substituted carbons are favored do to a more stable carbocation. So acidic conditions cause an epoxide to open up on the more substituted side.

a) When you see 2 carbons and 1 oxygen, that the tell-tale sign that you're adding ethylene oxide (the simplest epoxide).

But that would only leave you with an alcohol. How do you get to the ether? Using the Williamson ether synthesis.

b) As I mentioned in problem 673, when you see an alcohol you are also looking at a carbonyl, because you can interconvert the two (alcohol to aldehyde/ketone using PCC, aldehyde/ketone to alcohol using NaBH₄).

To add the methyl group, convert the alcohol to a ketone (which is an electrophile), and then add methyl Grignard (a nucleophile). But once again, you are only left with an alcohol. How to convert it to an ether? The Williamson ether synthesis.

When you see an ether in a synthesis problem, remember the Williamson ether synthesis. It will come in handy.

The trick to synthesis problems in second semester organic chemistry to recognize that alcohols ARE ketones ARE carboxylic acids. What do I mean? Alcohols, ketones/aldehydes, and carboxylic acids can all be easily converted using PCC or Jones Reagent (NaCr₂O₇/H₂SO₄).

For example, for a), the product is a ketone, but it may as well be an alcohol, because alcohols can be converted to ketones with PCC.

b) is similar, except the position of the alcohol (one away from the "bond cut", instead of directly connected to the cut as in a) ) indicates the starting material was an epoxide and not a carbonyl.

c) is just like b), except instead of PCC, use Jones Reagent to oxidize the alcohol all the way to a carboxylic acid.

The trick to these retrosynthesis problems is to determine where the connections or "cuts" were made.

The carbonyl carbon becomes an alcohol after a Grignard reaction, so that's where the "cut" must be.

Note that there can often be more than one correct answer to these types of problems.

For a), adding propyl Grignard to acetone or methyl Grignard to 2-pentanone will result in the product.

We can also use two equivalents of methyl Grignard with 4-carbon ester, such as ethyl butanoate. Esters contains a build in leaving group (^-OR) and so react twice with Grignards.

For b), adding phenyl Grignard to cyclopentanone will do the job.