Electrophilic Aromatic Substitution

Note that some textbooks don't draw EAS electrophiles with formal positive charges.

Some textbooks instead draw electrophiles with partial positive charges and a leaving group. It's just a convention, and doesn't affect the product of an EAS reaction. See the problem 595 for an explanation of the difference.

The electrophile we need for this EAS reaction is HO⁺. We can generate it by protonating one of the oxygens in peroxide, which causes it to act as a leaving group.

On the left side of this image I make a note about the structure of the electrophile. Some textbooks use electrophiles with formal positive charges, such as HO⁺. Other textbooks don't use formal positive charges, and instead use partial positive charges with a leaving group, such as HO-OH₂⁺. Using HO⁺ as the electrophile is analogous to an S_N1 reaction, while using HO-OH₂⁺. is analogous to an S_N2 reaction. When you draw mechanisms, you should use whichever convention your textbook uses. Both lead to the same product.

Friedel-Crafts alkylation is prone to carbocation rearrangement. In this case, alkylation produced a 1º carbocation which rearranged to a 3º carbocation, leading to compound B.

We can avoid this by instead doing Friedel-Crafts acylation. The intermediate in acylation is the acylium ion, which is stabilized by resonance and so won't rearrange.

But after the acylation reaction we have to get rid of the carbonyl (C=O) group, so we do a Wolff-Kishner reduction (N₂H₄/NaOH, heat).

Notice that the electrophile takes the place of the hydrogen.