Substituted Benzene EAS (EDG and EWG Effects)

Problem # 592

Naphthalene undergoes eletrophilic substitution at C-1.

Why is this the case, even though substitution at C-2 gives more resonance forms?

Substitution at C-1 and C-2 both lead to many resonance forms. But the resonance forms that arrise from substitution at C-2 are not aromatic, while the resonance forms from substitution at C-1 are aromatic (the benzene ring is maintained).

So the C-1 resonance forms are more stable than the C-2 resonance forms, so substitution occurs at C-1 instead of C-2.

Problem Details

MendelSet practice problem # 592 submitted by Matt on July 9, 2011.

Subject: Organic Chemistry

Subject Topic(s): Substituted Benzene EAS (EDG and EWG Effects)

Question Type: Concept (explain why this is so..)

Keyword(s): EAS mechanism

Problem # 590

-NO₂ is an EWG and a meta director. Let's draw an EAS reaction's cyclohexadienyl cation intermediates to demonstrate why this is true. I've started you off.

What's good about meta? What's bad about ortho/para?

Solution

Short answer: -NO₂ is an meta director because the cyclohexadienyl intermediates that result from meta addtition are more stable than those that result from ortho or para addition.

Long answer: Addition at both the ortho or para positions lead to a cyclohexadienyl cation that contains two adjacent positive charges. This is very unstable, and so addition at the ortho or para positions is not favored.

The cyclohexadienyl cations that result from meta addition don't have this problem.

This will be the base for any substituent that has a positive charge (or partial positive charge). So -NO₂, -C(O)R, -CF₃, -NH₃⁺, -CN, and -SO₃R are all meta directors.