Alkene Formation: Elimination, Dehydration, and Zaitsev's Rule

The first step in this reaciton, like many reactions, is an acid-base reaction- when you see an H⁺ (acid), the first step is usually something getting protonated. This starting material is a thiol (sulfur), but the same thing would happen with an alcohol or ether (oxygen).

When you have a protonated thiol (or alcohol, ether, etc.), you know the reaction isn't finished yet- products are rarely charged. There are two legal moves to get that positive charge off of the protonated thiol. Either the thiol deprotonates, or it takes off as a neutral leaving group. It can't deprontate because that would be going backwards, so your only "legal move" is for the HSCH₂CH₃ to act as a leaving group (See problem 518).

But then you're left with a carbocation, which is definitely not the final product. How can we get rid of it? (See problem 335 for general ways carbocations react). If the HSCH₂CH₃ attacked in an S_N1 type reaction that would be OK, but it would be going backwards! So the only way to get rid of the carbocation is to do a beta-elminiation (E1).

Protonation is a common first step in mechanisms. When you have a protonated alcohol, it's likely that either:

1. The alcohol will deprotonate to form a neutral alcohol (right), or
2. The alcohol will leave as a neutral molecule to form a carbocation.

Either one is possible. If you're not sure which one happens, remember that when writing out mechanisms, never go backwards- don't draw structures you have drawn before.

The delta (Δ) in the reaciton arrows means that heat is being added to this reaction, which tends to favor elimination over substitution. Also, the reaction is using a non-nucleophilic acid (H₂SO₄), which tends to favor elimination reactions (H₃PO₄ is another common reagent for E1 reactions, while HCl or HBr tend to go S_N1).

Because this reaction is taking place in acid, a carbocation is likely to form, so this is an E1 reaction. Since water is lost over the course of the reaction, this is a dehydration, which is a type of elimination reaction.

You know this is an elimination reaction because no nucleophile is present; H₃PO₄ and H₂SO₄ are non-nucleophilic acids. IF the reagent were HCl or HBr on the other hand, this would be a substitution reaction.

Since acid is present, a carbocation will probably form, so we know that this is an E1 mechanism.

The 2º carbocation that is initially formed will undergo a 1,2-hydride shift to become a 3° carbocation, but that doesn't affect the final product of the reaction; with either the 2° or 3° carbocation, the most stable alkene product is 2-methyl-2-butene.

For a), the product is neutral and so you are done after the nucleophile (Cl-) attacks the carbocation.

For b), the the intermediate is a protonated alcohol, and so you must do a proton exchange step (also called a hydrogen exchange or deprotonation) to get the final alcohol product, which is neutral.

For c), there are two different types of beta hydrogens, and so two different alkenes are possible.

The more stable alkene is the one that will form, and this will always be the most highly substituted alkene. This is Zaitsev's rule. The rationale for this is hyperconjugation: neighboring carbon atoms stabilize an alkene.

The methyl group is bulky and so is most stable in the equatorial position.

The 1,4 cis compound's most stable chair form has its leaving group (Br) and beta-hydrogen in an anti-coplanar (anti-periplanar in some textbooks) conformation.

So most of the time, 1,4 cis is in a chair conformation that is able to undergo an E2 reaction.

The opposite is true for the 1,4 trans compound. Most of the time it is in a chair conformation that is unable to undergo an E2 reaction.

Therefore, the 1,4 cis compound will undergo an E2 elimination reaction faster than the 1,4 trans compound.