For the reaction below, draw the structures of the carbocation intermediate and the final product.
The delta (Δ) in the reaciton arrows means that heat is being added to this reaction, which tends to favor elimination over substitution. Also, the reaction is using a non-nucleophilic acid (H2SO4), which tends to favor elimination reactions (H3PO4 is another common reagent for E1 reactions, while HCl or HBr tend to go SN1).
Because this reaction is taking place in acid, a carbocation is likely to form, so this is an E1 reaction. Since water is lost over the course of the reaction, this is a dehydration, which is a type of elimination reaction.
MendelSet practice problem # 348 submitted by Matt on June 7, 2011.
The alcohol below is protonated and contains an oxygen with a positive charge. Using curved arrows, show the two "legal moves" that result in a neutral oxygen.
Protonation is a common first step in mechanisms. When you have a protonated alcohol, it's likely that either:
The alcohol will deprotonate to form a neutral alcohol (right), or
The alcohol will leave as a neutral molecule to form a carbocation.
Either one is possible. If you're not sure which one happens, remember that when writing out mechanisms, never go backwards- don't draw structures you have drawn before.
MendelSet practice problem # 518 submitted by Matt on June 30, 2011.
Let's work through an elimination reaction. Draw the structures for each of the species in the three boxes below (protonated thiol, carbocation, and alkene). Also draw curved arrows to show electron movement.
The first step in this reaciton, like many reactions, is an acid-base reaction- when you see an H+ (acid), the first step is usually something getting protonated. This starting material is a thiol (sulfur), but the same thing would happen with an alcohol or ether (oxygen).
When you have a protonated thiol (or alcohol, ether, etc.), you know the reaction isn't finished yet- products are rarely charged. There are two legal moves to get that positive charge off of the protonated thiol. Either the thiol deprotonates, or it takes off as a neutral leaving group. It can't deprontate because that would be going backwards, so your only "legal move" is for the HSCH2CH3 to act as a leaving group (See problem 518).
But then you're left with a carbocation, which is definitely not the final product. How can we get rid of it? (See problem 335 for general ways carbocations react). If the HSCH2CH3 attacked in an SN1 type reaction that would be OK, but it would be going backwards! So the only way to get rid of the carbocation is to do a beta-elminiation (E1).
MendelSet practice problem # 519 submitted by Matt on June 30, 2011.
Rank the group of molecules below in in order of decreasing basicity. (1 = most basic)
Explain your reasoning.
The alkyne (triple bond) is the most stable and therefore the least basic. This is because it is sp hybridized.
An s-orbital is closer to the nucleus and more electronegative than a p-orbital, and an sp hybridized atom has 50% s-character.
Alkenes are sp2 hybridized and have 33% s-character, and alkanes are sp3 hybridized and have 25% s-character.
Because sp hybridized carbons have the most s-character, they are more electronegative and are better at stabilizing negative formal charges than sp2 or sp3 carbons are.
Therefore, the alkane (sp3) is the least stable/strongest base, while the alkyne (sp) is the most stable/weakest base.
MendelSet practice problem # 307 submitted by Matt on June 7, 2011.
Fill in the product for each reaction below. Indicate stereochemistry where appropriate.
NaNH2 is a very strong base (the pKa of ammonia, its conjugate acid, is about 35) and will easily depronate a terminal alkyne (pK ~ 25), producing a negatively charged alkyne carbon (an acetylide).
The acetylide is a strong nucleophile and will undergo an SN2 reaction with the 1ºalkyl halide. (acetylide is also a strong base, so with 2º or bulkier alkyl halides, it will go E2 instead).
Finally, Lindlar's catalyst will reduce the alkyne to a cis alkene.
MendelSet practice problem # 561 submitted by Matt on July 8, 2011.
For a molecule to undergo an E2 reaction, the leaving group and the beta-proton must be in an anti-coplanar conformation (one atom straight up, the other straight down). Based on this, which compound undergoes E2 reaction with KOtBu faster? Why?
The methyl group is bulky and so is most stable in the equatorial position.
The 1,4 cis compound's most stable chair form has its leaving group (Br) and beta-hydrogen in an anti-coplanar (anti-periplanar in some textbooks) conformation.
So most of the time, 1,4 cis is in a chair conformation that is able to undergo an E2 reaction.
The opposite is true for the 1,4 trans compound. Most of the time it is in a chair conformation that is unable to undergo an E2 reaction.
Therefore, the 1,4 cis compound will undergo an E2 elimination reaction faster than the 1,4 trans compound.
MendelSet practice problem # 319 submitted by Matt on June 7, 2011.
Predict the product(s) of the reaction below, and used curved arrows to show a mechanism.
You know this is an elimination reaction because no nucleophile is present; H3PO4 and H2SO4 are non-nucleophilic acids. IF the reagent were HCl or HBr on the other hand, this would be a substitution reaction.
Since acid is present, a carbocation will probably form, so we know that this is an E1 mechanism.
The 2º carbocation that is initially formed will undergo a 1,2-hydride shift to become a 3° carbocation, but that doesn't affect the final product of the reaction; with either the 2° or 3° carbocation, the most stable alkene product is 2-methyl-2-butene.
MendelSet practice problem # 341 submitted by Matt on June 7, 2011.
E2 elimination reactions require anti-coplanar geometry. (note: some textbooks call this anti-periplanar).
Let's work through an E2 reaction, and rotate the molecule eblow into an anti-coplanar geometry to predict the product of this E2 reaction.
To predict the stereochemistry of the alkene product from an E2 reaction, we have to rotate the leaving group (Br) and the beta-proton into anti-coplanar geometry. It's easiest to put the H and Br in the plane of the page.
After we do this, we see that both the ethyl and phenyl groups are wedges, and the two methyls are dashes. So after the E2 reaction, the resulting alkene will have its two methyl groups cis to each other.
MendelSet practice problem # 531 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.
Indicate the major organic product of the reaction below. Include stereochemistry.
This is a hydrogenation reaction. The product is an alkane. But this product has two stereocenters.
Normally, the product would be a racemic mixuture of enantiomers (equal amounts of each stereoisomer). But in this case, the starting material is optically active (chiral but not racemic), so the products won't be equal and opposite as usual.
Since there is a substitutent blocking the top face of the molecule (isopropyl is a wedge), the hydrogens will preferentially add to the opposite face of the molecule (dashes).
MendelSet practice problem # 529 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.
Let's work through anti and syn additions to alkenes.
Show the product for each reaction below, and indicate whether the product will be a racemic mixture of enantiomers, or a meso compound (which is achiral).
The reaciton of an alkene with Br2 is an anti-addition, and hydrogenation (H2 or D2) is a syn addition. From this we can figure our the relative stereochemistry of each product.
Each starting material is achiral, and therefore not optically active, so the products cannot be optically active.
There are three ways for products not to be optically active:
products can be achiral
products can be a racemic mixture
products can be meso
In both a) and b) each product has a sterocenter, so the products can't be achiral.
In a), one stereocenter is S and the other stereocenter is R, and both with the same substituents, so this is a mirror image relationship, and the products are meso.
In b), the products have no internal mirror planes, so the products are chiral, and must be a racemic mixture.
MendelSet practice problem # 530 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.