Assign R or S configuration for each molecule below.
a) is straightforward. I've started you off in b).
It's easiest to assign R or S configuration when the lowest priority substituent is "in the back" or "behind" the molecule, that is, a dash. Most of the time the lowest priority substituent will be a hydrogen atom.
So a) is straightforward. Because hydrogen is already a dash, we can ignore it and see in which direction the other three substituents decrease in priority (according to Cahn–Ingold–Prelog priority rules). Since they decrease in a counter-clockwise way, a) has S absolute configuration.
b) is a little harder to assign. If hydrogen were a wedge we would be able to just take the opposite of whatever answer we get. But in this case, H is neither a wedge nor a dash. So we use a trick: if we swtich any two pairs of substituents, the absolute configuration of the molecule remains the same. So we switch two pairs so that the hydrogen becomes a dash. On the resulting molecule, the priorities 1-3 decrease in a clockwise manner, so this molecule has an R absolute configuration.
MendelSet practice problem # 526 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.
Draw the structure of (2R,3S) 2-bromo-3-chlorobutane using wedges and dashes. Also draw a Fischer projection.
This is two separate problems. Many textbooks describe how to mentally convert " zig-zag" (wedge/dash) structures to Fischer projections, but I've never met a student who can do this without making mistakes. So you should convert the name ((2R,3S) 2-bromo-3-chlorobutane) to a zig-zag structure, and then convert the name to a Fischer projection. Never try to convert a zig-zag structure directly to a Fischer projection.
To draw the zig-zag structure, first draw a structure with each halogen (the highest priority substituents) as a wedge, see the R/S configuration we drew, and then adjust as necessary. Why wedges? Because that puts the hydrogen as a dash, so R/S is easy to assign. With two wedges, the structure is (2R, 3R). So the 2R position is fine, and we just switch the wedge at C-3 to a dash, and the structure is correct (2R,3S).
To draw the Fischer projection, we do something similar- arbitaritly draw a structure, check R/S, and then adjust as necessary. In the structure below, I drew (arbitarily) 2S,3S, but we need 2R,3S, so I just switch C-2 and we have the correct structure.
MendelSet practice problem # 527 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.
Indicate which of the molecules below are chiral (if any).
There are several types of chirality. In undergraduate organic chemistry, most chiral molecules exhibit point chirality- they have at least one sterocenter and don't have a plane of symmetry. Molecules a) and b) both have stereocenters, but they also both have planes of symmetry, so neither is chiral (they are both meso compounds).
Molecule can also be chiral about an axis. The classic example of this is allenes- molecules with two consecutive double bonds. Compound c) has a plane of symmetry so it can't be chiral. It might be hard to see, but compound d) is in fact chiral- it's mirror images are non-super impossible. It has a "chirality axis." Just like a screw can be right-handed or left-handed, so can molecule d).
MendelSet practice problem # 528 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.
Indicate the major organic product of the reaction below. Include stereochemistry.
This is a hydrogenation reaction. The product is an alkane. But this product has two stereocenters.
Normally, the product would be a racemic mixuture of enantiomers (equal amounts of each stereoisomer). But in this case, the starting material is optically active (chiral but not racemic), so the products won't be equal and opposite as usual.
Since there is a substitutent blocking the top face of the molecule (isopropyl is a wedge), the hydrogens will preferentially add to the opposite face of the molecule (dashes).
MendelSet practice problem # 529 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.
Let's work through anti and syn additions to alkenes.
Show the product for each reaction below, and indicate whether the product will be a racemic mixture of enantiomers, or a meso compound (which is achiral).
The reaciton of an alkene with Br2 is an anti-addition, and hydrogenation (H2 or D2) is a syn addition. From this we can figure our the relative stereochemistry of each product.
Each starting material is achiral, and therefore not optically active, so the products cannot be optically active.
There are three ways for products not to be optically active:
products can be achiral
products can be a racemic mixture
products can be meso
In both a) and b) each product has a sterocenter, so the products can't be achiral.
In a), one stereocenter is S and the other stereocenter is R, and both with the same substituents, so this is a mirror image relationship, and the products are meso.
In b), the products have no internal mirror planes, so the products are chiral, and must be a racemic mixture.
MendelSet practice problem # 530 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.
E2 elimination reactions require anti-coplanar geometry. (note: some textbooks call this anti-periplanar).
Let's work through an E2 reaction, and rotate the molecule eblow into an anti-coplanar geometry to predict the product of this E2 reaction.
To predict the stereochemistry of the alkene product from an E2 reaction, we have to rotate the leaving group (Br) and the beta-proton into anti-coplanar geometry. It's easiest to put the H and Br in the plane of the page.
After we do this, we see that both the ethyl and phenyl groups are wedges, and the two methyls are dashes. So after the E2 reaction, the resulting alkene will have its two methyl groups cis to each other.
MendelSet practice problem # 531 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.
Let's work through a chiral resolution. Write out the structure of the indicated compound in each box. Include stereochemistry.
Why is it possible to separate the (R,R) and (R,S) salts?
The starting material (2-aminobutane) is a racemic; it has equal amounts of R and S enantiomers.
Enantiomers have the same the same chemical and physical properties, so we can't separate them using common lab techniques, such as recrystallization, chromatography, etc. But diastereomers can have different properties, and we can exploit this fact to separate otherwise inseparable compounds.
Adding an optically pure acid to the amine produces a diastereomeric mixture of salts which can be separated. Adding a base (NaOH) "breaks" the salt and allows us to isolate the pure R or S amine.
We are able to separate the (R,R) and (R,S) salts because they are diastereomers and so have different chemical and physical properties.
MendelSet practice problem # 532 submitted by Matt on July 2, 2011.