Show how each alcohol can be prepared from a combination of a carbonyl and a Grignard reagent.
The trick to these retrosynthesis problems is to determine where the connections or "cuts" were made.
The carbonyl carbon becomes an alcohol after a Grignard reaction, so that's where the "cut" must be.
Note that there can often be more than one correct answer to these types of problems.
For a), adding propyl Grignard to acetone or methyl Grignard to 2-pentanone will result in the product.
We can also use two equivalents of methyl Grignard with 4-carbon ester, such as ethyl butanoate. Esters contains a build in leaving group (-OR) and so react twice with Grignards.
For b), adding phenyl Grignard to cyclopentanone will do the job.
MendelSet practice problem # 668 submitted by Matt on July 18, 2011.
You may have noticed that the "solvent of choice" for many organometallic compounds such as Grignard reagents is ether (short for diethyl ether).
Why is it that for Grignard reactions this solvent is used over ethyl acetate, or protic solvents such as ethanol?
Grignards behave as though they are carbanions (negatively charged carbons), and so are very basic. There are so basic that they will deprotonate any O-H or N-H bond. So protic solvents such as water or ethanol aren't suitable for Grignard reactions; the Grignard reagent will react with the alcohol in an acid-base reaction.
In fact, water is used after a Grignard reaction to quench the Grignard reagent.
Grignards are also nucleophilic, and so react with carbonyls (which are electrophiles).
Ethyl acetate contins a carbonyl and would get attacked by a Grignard reagent, and so also isn't a suitable solvent for a Grignard reaction.
Diethyl ether doesn't have any acidic protons and isn't electrophilic and so won't react with a Grignard reagent, so it makes a good solvent.
MendelSet practice problem # 671 submitted by Matt on July 18, 2011.
Carbonyls are in equilibrium with their hydrate forms. This equilibrium happens in both acid and base.
Let's go through this equilibrium under basic conditions. Draw a mechanism using curved arrows for each reaction below.
Remember that under basic conditions, most species are either neutral or negatively charged, and rarely positively charged. So your structures will contain either ROH or RO-, but not ROH2+.
a) Carbonyl to Hydrate
Notice that no oxygen is ever positive during these basic mechanisms (always negative or neutral).
b) Hydrate to Carbonyl
The mechanisms in this problem and problem 706 are the most common mechanisms you will draw during second semester organic chemistry, and so it's a good idea to draw them out a few times.
In a), the nucleophile attacks the carbonyl carbon, and the double bond goes "up" to form a tetrahedral (sp3) carbon.
In b), one of the oxygen atoms acts as leaving group, and a lone pair on the other oxygen comes "down" to reform the double bond (and the sp2 carbon).
You will see this "up, down, kick" pattern in most mechanisms that involve attack at the carbonyl carbon, which is most of the reactions in second semester orgo!
a) Carbonyl to Hydrate (basic conditions) "UP"
b) Hydrate to Carbonyl (basic conditions) "DOWN"
MendelSet practice problem # 705 submitted by Matt on July 21, 2011.
Carbonyls are in equilibrium with their hydrate forms. This equilibrium happens in both acid and base.
Let's go through this equilibrium under acidic conditions. Draw a mechanism using curved arrows for each reaction below.
Remember that under acidic conditions, most species are either neutral or positively charged, and rarely negatively charged. So your structures will contain either ROH or ROH2+, but not RO-.
a) Carbonyl to Hydrate (acidic)
b) Hydrate to Carbonyl (acidic)
The interconversion between a carbonyl (sp2 carbon) and a tetrahedral intermediate (sp3 carbon) is the most common mechanism you will encounter in second semester organic chemistry.
You should be familiar drawing it under both acidic (this problem) and basic (problem 705) conditions.
In a), the carbonyl "goes up" to form a tetrahedral intermediate.
In b), an oxygen "comes back down" to reform the carbonyl and kick off a leaving group.
You will see this "up, down, kick" pattern in most mechanisms that involve attack at the carbonyl carbon, which is most of the reactions in second semester orgo!
a) Carbonyl to Hydrate (acidic) "UP"
Because this reaction takes place under acidic conditions, the carbonyl must protonate before the nucleophile attacks, to prevent oxygen from ever being negative (ROH instead of RO-).
b) Hydrate to Carbonyl (acidic) "DOWN"
The leaving group must protonate before it leaves, so it doesn't leave as a negative molecule (H2O instead of HO-).
MendelSet practice problem # 706 submitted by Matt on July 22, 2011.
Rank the carbonyls A-D below in order of decreasing electrophilicity (reactivity with nucleophiles).
(1 = Most reactive). Explain your reasoning.
The carbonyl carbon is electrophilic because it has a partial positive charge.
Are there any groups that make a carbon more positive? Yes, electron withdrawing groups (EWG). They pull away electron density, which increases electrophility. So C is the most reactive.
Conversely, electron donating groups (EDG) add electron density, and so make the carbonyl carbon less positive, and less electrophilic. Alkyl groups (carbon chains) are mildly EDG so ketone B will be less reactive than C.
Hydrogen is neither a EDG or EWG, so the aldehyde A will be in between the B and C. Also, the hydrogen is very small, so the carbonyl carbon is easily to get to (less steric bulk to block an attack).
Ester D is the least reactive because it has a resonance (the lone pair on the oxygen gets involved).
So overall, the order form most reactive to least reactive is C > A > B > D.
MendelSet practice problem # 710 submitted by Matt on July 22, 2011.
Show a mechanism for the reduction of butyrolactone using LiAlH4.
Hydride reagents such as LiAlH4 and NaBH4 behave like hydride nucleophiles (H-), so that's what I used as shorthand. The real mechanism is very similar but involves aluminum coordinating to the oxygen.
Notice that the the ester will reform the carbonyl after the first hydride attacks. This is because esters have a built in leaving group, and so undergo nucleophilic acyl substitution reactions. The aldehyde that forms then undergoes a nucleophilic acyl addition reaction with the second equivalent of hydride.
Also note that you can't stop the reaction halfway at the aldehyde- LiAlH4 will take an ester all the way down to an alcohol.
MendelSet practice problem # 674 submitted by Matt on July 19, 2011.
Draw out the mechanism for the addition of excess phenyl Grignard to the carbonyl compound below.
This carbonyl has two leaving groups attached to it- each of those oxygens can take part in a nucleophilic acyl substitution reaction and form a new carbonyl product.
First the Grignard attacks the oxidation state IV carbonyl carbon (4 oxygen bonds, so oxidation state 4). The carbonyl itself will act as a leaving group and form a tetrahedral intermediate. But tetrahedral intermediates don't last if there are any leaving groups attached to the carbon, so the -O will "come back down again", kick off an oxygen leaving group, and reform the carbonyl.
Then a second equivalent of Grignard will attack that carbonyl (an ester), and we will do another nucleophilic acyl substitution reaction to form yet another carbonyl.
Finally, the third carbonyl doesn't have any leaving groups built in (it's a ketone), so when the third equivalent of Grignard attacks it, it will do a nucleophilic acyl addition reaction, and the product will be an alcohol.
Notice that as the reaction progresses the oxidation state of the carbonyl carbon (number of oxygen bonds attached to it) goes down form 4 to 3 to 2 and then to 1.
MendelSet practice problem # 670 submitted by Matt on July 18, 2011.
The overall mechanism for imine formation is shown below. (This isn't a real mechanism, just an outline)
Use curved arrows to draw the full mechanism for imine formation under acidic conditions. (I've added outlines of the intermediate structures for you to use as a guide). This mechanism is similar to that in problem 706 (carbonyl hydrate equilibria).
This reaction takes place under acidic conditions, so oxygen should never be negative (only neutral or positively charged).
Acidic mechanisms tend to be a bit of pain, because you have to include many proton transfer steps (protonation and deprotonation).
MendelSet practice problem # 707 submitted by Matt on July 22, 2011.
Show two ways of preparing the alkene below via the Wittig reaction starting from triphenyl phosphine (PPh3).
Is one route better than the other? Why?
Alkenes can be prepared from a combination of ylide and aldehyde or ketone. This is the Wittig reaction.
One carbon on the alkene comes from the carbon bonded to the PPh3 on the ylide, and the other carbon comes from the carbonyl.
There are usually two different ways to make an alkene via the Wittig reaction. So is one way better than the other?
Yes. Ylides come from the SN2 reaction of PPh3 with an alkyl halide. Because it's an SN2 reaction, you want to use the least substituted alkyl halide! (1º is better than 2º). So of the two reactions below that would result in the desired alkene, the top method is better because it involves the less bulky alkyl halide.
This principle also holds true for the Williamson ether synthesis (problem 703). Less substituted alkyl halides are better for SN2 reactions.
MendelSet practice problem # 711 submitted by Matt on July 22, 2011.
Complete each synthesis below. All carbon sources must come from alkenes.
Each synthesis will involve protecting groups.
The protecting group most commonly used for aldehydes and ketones (in undergraduate orgo) is ethylene glycol.
It is put on using HOCH2CH2OH/H+ and removed with H2O/H+.
For a), the reaction calls for the use of acetylide with an alkyl halide. But acetylides also react with carbonyls.
So before the alkyne is deprotonated using a strong base (such as NaNH2), the carbonyl must be protected with ethylene glycol.
For b), the reaction calls for the addition of two equivalents of phenyl Grignard to the ester. The problem is that esters aren't as reactive as ketones (or aldehydes), so the Grignard would react with the ketone before it ever touched the ester! To prevent this, the ketone must be protected before Grignard is added.
MendelSet practice problem # 714 submitted by Matt on July 22, 2011.
a) Is α-D-glucose an acetal, hemiacetal, ketal, or hemiketal?
b) Draw the carbonyl form of α-D-glucose.
a) You can spot the carbonyl carbon because it's the one with two oxygens bonded to it (oxidation state II).
The carbonyl carbon has an -OH (alcohol) bonded to it, and not an -OR (ether), so it's a hemiacetal or a kemiketal.
The carbonyl carbon also has a hydrogen bonded to it, so it must have come form an aldehyde (instead of ketone). So it's a hemiacetal. (remember: aldehyde -> acetal, ketone -> ketal).
b) The hemiacetal carbon's -OH (or -OR in the case of a ketal or acetal) is the oxygen that used to be the carbonyl C=O.
MendelSet practice problem # 715 submitted by Matt on July 23, 2011.
Compound A has molecular formula C6H12O and shows a sharp peak at 1,710 cm-1 in its IR spectrum.
Treatment with 1 equivalent of phenyl Grignard yields compound B, which has formula C12H18O and whose IR shows a broad peak at 3,350 cm-1.
Compound B's 1H NMR spectrum is shown below. Determine the structures of compounds A and B.
Let's use steps similar those outlined in problem 662 to solve this NMR structure elucidation problem.
1.Are there any hints?
Yes, from the IR peaks. The starting material is a carbonyl (sharp IR peak at ~1,700 cm-1) and the product is an alcohol (broad IR peak ~3,300 cm-1).
2.How many IHD are in each compound? (also known as degrees of unsaturation or DBE).
C6H12O is the same as C6H12 (ignore oxygen) which should be C6H14 if fully saturated (CnH2n+2). It's missing 2 hydrogens so C6H12O has 1 IHD. This 1 IHD must be the carbonyl.
C12H18O is the smae as C12H18 which should be C12H26 if fully saturated. It's missing 8 hydrogens so it has 4 IHD. The benzene from the Grignard reagent must account for all 4 IHD.
3.Draw some C6H12O and C12H18O structures and elminate those that don't fit the data, then learn and repeat.
Things we know from the problem and NMR:
The starting material is a carbonyl and we're adding a Grignard, so we expect the product to be an alcohol. The NMR shows a peak that disappears with D2O addition, which also confirms that the product is an alcohol.
The product must have a benzene ring because the reagent was phenyl Grignard. That accounts for the aromatic signals (~7 ppm) and the 4 IHD in the product.
the NMR shows a doublet with an integration of 6 and a multiplet with an integration of 1. This is the splitting pattern on an isopropyl group.
The NMR also shows a quartet with an integration of 2 and a triplet with an integration of 3. This is the splitting pattern of an ethyl group.
Once you have a few clues from the NMR, start drawing structures! And then elminiate those that do not fit the data (too many signals, wrong multiplicity/integrations etc.).
MendelSet practice problem # 672 submitted by Matt on July 18, 2011.
When a carbonyl is treated with semicarbazide under acidic conditions an "imine" is produced called a semicarbazone.
Which of the two products below is the correct structure for a semicarbazone? Explain.
What this problem is really asking is "Which nitrogen on semicarbazide is more nucleophilic?"
The nitrogens bonded to the carbonyl on semicarbazide all have resonance forms, so their lone pairs aren't as available for nucleophilic attack.
The other nitrogen (on the left) is the most nucleophilic because it isn't involved in any resonance forms, so its lone pair isn't shared with another atoms.
MendelSet practice problem # 713 submitted by Matt on July 22, 2011.