Textbook: Carey and Giuliano 8th Ed. (2010)

Note that some textbooks don't draw EAS electrophiles with formal positive charges.

Some textbooks instead draw electrophiles with partial positive charges and a leaving group. It's just a convention, and doesn't affect the product of an EAS reaction. See the problem 595 for an explanation of the difference.

The resonance forms for EDG add electron density to the ring (and add a negative charge), while the resonance forms for EWG remove electron density from the ring (and leave a positive charge). This is where the terms electron donating group and electron withdrawing group come from.

EAS reactions require benzene to attack something positive (an electrophile), so the more electron density, the better. This is why EDG tend to speed up EAS reactions, while EWG slow down EAS reactions.

Notice that for EDG, the ortho and para positions are partially negative. In EAS reactions benzene attacks a positively charged electrophile, so its not too surprising that the electrophile will want to add at o/p if a EDG is present.

But for EWG, the o/p positions pick up a partial positive charge. So for EAS reactions with a EWG, it's not surprising that the electrophile will avoid the o/p positions, and add meta instead.

This is one explanation for the general trend: 

• EDG are ortho/para directors and activating.
• EWG are meta directors and deactivating.

Electrophilic substitution at C-2 leads to a carbocation intermediate with three resonance forms, while substitution at C-3 leads to a carbocation intermediate with only two resonance forms.

The C-2 intermediate has more resonance forms than the C-3 intermediate, and so is more stable. Therefore, EAS occurs at C-2.

This is a good synthesis to know, because vinyl benzene is a good starting point for many synthesis problems you will encounter down the road.

An ethyl group can be added to benzene via Friedel-Crafts alkylation. 

To add that alkene, we you will have to do some sort of elimination reaction. The easiest way to do this is via bromination. Free radical bromination (with NBS or Br₂/hν) will add a bromine to the position of the most stable radical, which is the benzylic position (due to resonance).

Then adding a strong base like potassium tert-butoxide will do an E2 reaction to form the alkene.

For S_NAr to work you need to have electron withdrawing groups (EWG) either ortho or para to the leaving group.

This molecule has two leaving groups (chlorines), but only one chlorine has EWG ortho/para to it. So that's the carbon where the nucleophile (NH₃) will attack.

Why do EWG need to be ortho/para? Because that's the only way for the negative charge to be stabilized by resonance. Try it- if you have the NH₃ attack the other carbon with a chlorine, you will not be able to draw a resonance form that places the negative charge on one of the EWG.

Short answer: -OR is an ortho/para director because the cyclohexadienyl intermediates that result from ortho and para addtitions are more stable than those that result from meta addition.

Long answer: The cyclohexadienyl intermediates from ortho and para addition include a resonance form where the oxygen is adjacent to the carbocation, while the cyclohexadienyl intermediates from a meta addition do not.

When an oxygen (or anything with a lone pair) is adjacent to a carbocation, it can share its lone pair and stabilize the positive charge. This is only possible when the electrophile adds to the ortho or para positions, so those positions are favored with -OR as a substituent. Hence, -OR is an ortho/para director.

Note that this logic holds for any substituent with a lone pair, so -OH, -OR, -NH₂, -NR₂, -F, -Cl, -Br, and -I are all ortho/para directors.

a) The species on the left are much more stable than the species on the right because they have complete octets.

Nitrogen is less electronegative than oxygen, so a positive nitrogen (with a full octect) is more stable than a positive oxygen; oxygen is electronegative and so doesn't "like" being positive (have low electron density). 

The carbocation and the "nitrocation" are both very unstable because they only have 6 valence electrons. Because nitrogen is more electronegative than carbon, the nitrocation is even less stable than the carbocation, because its worse at handling a positive charge.

b) The cation intermediates that result from substitution at C-3 only contain carbocations, while the intermdiates from C-2 or C-4 substitution contain a "nitrocation," which is less stable than a regular carbocation, and so are not favored. So pyridine undergoes EAS reactions at C-3.

One more note: For substitution at C-2 and C-4, it's tempting to draw a resonance form where the positive charge is on the nitrogen, which is flanked by two double bonds. But this cyclic compound is too strained to exist, and so doesn't contribute to this analysis.

Halogens get more reactive towards Grignard formation as we go down the periodic table, so Mg⁰ will form a Grignard with Br before F.

Grignards behave like negatively charged carbon atoms- very unstable. So even though fluorine is a poor leaving group, the negative carbon will cause it to eliminate to form benzyne.