My Problems

Nucleophilicity increases with electron density; negatively charged molecules are more nucleophilic than neutral molecules. So HS^- is the best nucleophile in this group.

Nucleophilicity also increases with size. This is because the larger an atom, the more polarizable it is. Size increases as we go down the periodic table, so H₂S is a better nucleophile than H₂O.

These are substitution reactions. In each case we're replacing the -OH with either -CN or -I, so the nucleophiles will be NaCN or NaI (S_N2 conditions).

Hydroxide (HO^-) is a poor leaving group, so the first step in each of these reactions will be to convert the alcohol into a better leaving group. Two good leaving groups are Br^- and SO₃R^-, but which one to use?

Every time an S_N2 reation takes place the wedge on the alpha carbon becomes a dash (and vice-versa).

For a), the wedge remains a wedge, so we have to do two S_N2 reactions (wedge to dash to wedge again). So we use PBr₃ to turn the OH into a Br. (Bromination of an alcohol with PBr₃ is an S_N2 reaction and so inverts stereochemistry).

For b), the wedge becomes a dash, so we can only do one SN2 reaction. So instead of using PBr₃ to make the OH a better leaving group, we use RSO₂Cl, which doesn't break the carbon-oxygen bond and so doesn't invert the stereochemistry.

Charged molecules are generally less table than neutral ones, and each of the molecules below has a negatively charged oxygen.

But not all negative charges are equal; some oxygens are "closer to neutral" than others. How? Because resonance stabilizes charges by sharing electron density over multiple atoms (this is called electron delocalization).

Hydroxide (HO^-) doesn't have resonance, so the oxygen has 100% of the negative charge to itself. On the other hand, the sulfonate ester (SO₃R^-) has three resonance forms, so each oxygen only has ~33% of a negative charge. So the sulfonate ester is the most stable anion.

In general, the more resonance forms a molecule has, the more stable it is.

The starting material (2-aminobutane) is a racemic; it has equal amounts of R and S enantiomers.

Enantiomers have the same the same chemical and physical properties, so we can't separate them using common lab techniques, such as recrystallization, chromatography, etc. But diastereomers can have different properties, and we can exploit this fact to separate otherwise inseparable compounds.

Adding an optically pure acid to the amine produces a diastereomeric mixture of salts which can be separated. Adding a base (NaOH) "breaks" the salt and allows us to isolate the pure R or S amine.

We are able to separate the (R,R) and (R,S) salts because they are diastereomers and so have different chemical and physical properties.

The reaciton of an alkene with Br₂ is an anti-addition, and hydrogenation (H₂ or D₂) is a syn addition. From this we can figure our the relative stereochemistry of each product.

Each starting material is achiral, and therefore not optically active, so the products cannot be optically active. 

There are three ways for products not to be optically active:

• products can be achiral
• products can be a racemic mixture
• products can be meso

In both a) and b) each product has a sterocenter, so the products can't be achiral.

In a), one stereocenter is S and the other stereocenter is R, and both with the same substituents, so this is a mirror image relationship, and the products are meso.

In b), the products have no internal mirror planes, so the products are chiral, and must be a racemic mixture.

There are several types of chirality. In undergraduate organic chemistry, most chiral molecules exhibit point chirality- they have at least one sterocenter and don't have a plane of symmetry. Molecules a) and b) both have stereocenters, but they also both have planes of symmetry, so neither is chiral (they are both meso compounds).

Molecule can also be chiral about an axis. The classic example of this is allenes- molecules with two consecutive double bonds. Compound c) has a plane of symmetry so it can't be chiral. It might be hard to see, but compound d) is in fact chiral- it's mirror images are non-super impossible. It has a "chirality axis." Just like a screw can be right-handed or left-handed, so can molecule d). 

It's easiest to assign R or S configuration when the lowest priority substituent is "in the back" or "behind" the molecule, that is, a dash. Most of the time the lowest priority substituent will be a hydrogen atom.

So a) is straightforward. Because hydrogen is already a dash, we can ignore it and see in which direction the other three substituents decrease in priority (according to Cahn–Ingold–Prelog priority rules). Since they decrease in a counter-clockwise way, a) has S absolute configuration.

b) is a little harder to assign. If hydrogen were a wedge we would be able to just take the opposite of whatever answer we get. But in this case, H is neither a wedge nor a dash. So we use a trick: if we swtich any two pairs of substituents, the absolute configuration of the molecule remains the same. So we switch two pairs so that the hydrogen becomes a dash. On the resulting molecule, the priorities 1-3 decrease in a clockwise manner, so this molecule has an R absolute configuration.